| Back to
Essays THE FIRST NOBLE TRUTH OF SUFFERING :
DUKKHA
Ordinary Suffering
( dukkhadukkha)
Questions to Ask Oneself
What is my normal inclination towards life?
Is it over optimistic? Is it is pessimistic? Or is it realistic?
How would you answer the following:
1. How do I cope with physical pain?
2. How do I cope with mental pain e.g. boredom, anxiety, anger,
depression and so on
3. How do I cope with others in these moods?
4. When something unfortunate last happened to me, how did I react?
Dukkha literally means hard (du) to bear or difficult to endure
(kha). So Dukkha is variously translated as pain, suffering, misery,
discontent, discomfort, unhappiness, frustration, unsatisfactoriness
and such like. It is very difficult to translate into English since
it has so many shades of meaning much as our word "love"
has. But we need to know these meanings because Dukkha is a central
concept of the Buddha's teachings. In fact, it's the starting point
of his whole doctrine. The First Noble Truth states that life itself
is suffering, is unsatisfactory. Because of this bold statement
Buddhism is accused of being life negating, of being negative and
pessimistic. And it would be so, were it not for the Third Noble
Truth which states in equally bold fashion that there is an end
to suffering. The Buddha summed up his whole teaching, saying that
he only taught two things: the truth of suffering and the end of
suffering.
It was his experience of life as unsatisfactory that led the Buddha
to leave home and follow the hard ascetic life. The Buddha was
born into the Khshatriya caste who were the rulers, governors, 'landed
gentry' of those times. The other castes were and still are in
Hinduism: the Brahmins, the highest caste, who were the 'priests'
of the society. Beneath them the Khshatriya, then the Vaisya who
were the merchants and tradesmen, and finally the Suddra who were
the artisans and workers. All other peoples such as the slaves
were outside the cast system - the Pariahs, the Untouchables. The
Buddha's father was the leader of a small group of Khshatriya families
known as the Sakya, their clan name, who ruled in an area of North
India on the border of present day Nepal. Life for the young Siddhatta
Gotama was, we can believe, easy and pleasant, and may even have
been luxurious. It seems, however, that this courtly upbringing
did not hide from him the suffering inherent in life and a legend
tells how he came to face this. While out riding and hunting on
various days, he first saw a sick man, then a dying man and finally
a corpse. Here is a passage from one of the discourses, where the
Buddha explains his experience.
First he tells us how luxurious his life was: I was delicate, most
delicate, extremely delicate. Lily pools were made at my father's
house solely for my benefit. Blue lilies flowered in one, white
lilies in another, red lilies in a third. I used no sandalwood
that was not of Benares. My turban, tunic, lower garments and cloak
were all made of Benares cloth. A white sunshade was held over me
day and night, so no cold or heat or dust or grit or dew might inconvenience
me.
So now we have an idea of his courtly life style, but he continues:
Whilst I had such power and good fortune, yet I thought: When an
ordinary, untaught person, who is subject to sickness, not safe
from sickness, sees another who is sick, they are shocked, humiliated
and disgusted, for they have forgotten that they themself are no
exception. But I too am subject to sickness, not safe from sickness
and so it cannot be right for me to be shocked, humiliated and disgusted
when I see another who is sick. When I considered this, the vanity
of health completely left me. I thought: When an ordinary untaught
person, who is subject to ageing, not safe from ageing, sees another
who has aged, they are shocked, humiliated and disgusted, for they
have forgotten that they themself are no exception. But I
too am subject to ageing, not safe from ageing and so it cannot
be right for me to be shocked, humiliated and disgusted when I see
another who has aged. When I considered this the vanity of my youth
completely left me. I thought: When an ordinary untaught person,
who is subject to death, not safe from death, sees another who is
dead, he is shocked, humiliated and disgusted, for they have forgotten
that they themselves are no exception. But I too am subject to death,
not safe from death and so it cannot be right for me to be shocked,
humiliated and disgusted when I see another who is dead. When I
considered this the vanity of life completely left me.
Given the additions of an oral tradition for the scriptures were
not actually written down for 500 years after the Buddha's death,
what we can accept as fact is that the whole problem of suffering
had become a major concern for the young nobleman. The last straw,
it seems, was when he woke up in the early morning after a night
of revelry and saw about him bodies lying about in ungainly and
disgusting positions, the air foul with the smell of alcohol and
vomit. His sense of disgust, coupled with the growing weariness
of trying to find any real or meaningful happiness in a life geared
to sensual pleasure, finally caused him to leave home. That morning
he left early on his favourite horse, Kanthaka, and with his faithful
servant, Channa, rode beyond three kingdoms and crossed the River
Anoma. He cut off his hair as a sign of renouncing the life devoted
to sensual pleasure. He then gave his ornaments and jewellery to
Channa and went in search of a teacher. It is said that such was
the distress of his horse, Kanthaka, that he died of a heart attack!
In other discourses, reasons of a more philosophical nature are
given by the Buddha to explain how he came to this momentous decision,
known as the Great Renunciation.
In this way, before I was enlightened ... because I was subject
to birth, I wanted to find out the nature of birth ... So I thought
to myself, since I am subject to birth what if I were to find out
what birth really is and discover the unsatisfactoriness of the
nature of birth. So I set out to discover the unborn, the supreme
of Nibbana. And he says the same of sickness, old age and death.
In other words, he left the court, confidant there was an end to
suffering, which, by the way, is not annihilation. So what constitutes
this Dukkha? Suffering or unsatisfactoriness is divided into three
categories. The first is called ordinary suffering (Dukkha Dukkha);
the second is called the suffering caused by the changing nature
of life (Viparanama Dukkha); and the third is that caused by our
conditioning or conditioned states (Sankhara Dukkha). Here we shall
concern ourselves with the first category.
This is how the Buddha expounds the basic teachings of the Four
Noble Truths and the Eightfold Noble Path in his first discourse
after his enlightenment. It is called the 'Discourse on the Turning
of the Wheel of the Law'.
"This is the First Noble Truth of Suffering : birth is suffering,
decay is suffering, death is suffering; sorrow, grief, lamentation,
physical and mental pain, despair are all suffering. To be with
what we dislike is suffering, to be separated from what we like
is suffering."
Here it is important to grasp that the Buddha is talking about
those things people normally associate with suffering and pain:
the whole birth process, teething, acne, hormonal changes, middle
age crises, the aches and pains of growing old and the final agony
of death. He also means the emotional pains of frustration, anxiety,
depression, despair and so on. He is also saying that this is part
and parcel of life itself. We are subject to this suffering. It's
the package we accept when we're born. When we really contemplate
this, really think about it, it's depressing! Yes, it's true. The
only thing I can say with absolute certainty about my life is that
I will die. My life will end whether I like it or not. But it is
only when we find the courage to face this hard fact, rather than
avoid it, that there can be any possibility of discovering if there
is anything beyond this cycle of birth and death. That is what
the Buddha did as a young man. He decided to face the facts and
it led him to discover that which is beyond birth and death, Nibbana.
Much of our suffering lies in the fact that we find it hard to face
this sort of reality. It is a good exercise to look over the past
and see how we have approached and tackled problems, upsets, catastrophes
and traumas. One way we deal with the painful is to avoid it, to
shun it, to try to escape from it. We prefer to do anything but
feel the pain, physical or mental. On a physical level, as soon
as even a small ache is felt in the head, we reach for the bottle
of pills. Sometimes if we get a slight pain in the body, we'll
ignore it. We'll pretend it's nothing. But underneath the apparent
easygoing attitude is the fear we daren't face that it may be a
cancer or a dangerous illness. On the emotional level, if we feel
depressed, we'll try and drown it out with a drink. If we feel bored,
we'll try to escape by turning on the TV. If we feel lonely or
anxious, we'll phone a friend. Anything not to feel the boredom,
the depression, the anxiety, the loneliness and so on. We don't
want to feel them. Why should we! If these escape routes are blocked,
if we can't use my usual means of pushing these negative feelings
away, we'll talk 'about' them. We'll spend hours groaning, complaining,
whingeing and whining to family, friends, colleagues, doctors -
anyone who will listen. Even the cat gets an earful!
For instance, very few people will face up to the fact of death.
You can joke about it, but you can't talk about it seriously. That
can get too close to the feelings of terror and horror it arouses.
Some will have long conversations 'about' death. What is death?
What is it to die? To be or not to be. Wonderful questions, but
all intellectualisations, all rationalisations. It makes you feel
good to talk 'about' or 'around' death. But it's still escapism.
It's just a mental exercise. It separates us from the real feelings
we have about death. If we really want to know what it is to die,
we should visit mortuaries and look upon actual corpses! Not for
ghoulish fancies, but to arouse our subconscious fears. This is
what the monks in Buddha's time used to do. They would visit the
charnel grounds and gaze upon dead bodies in different states of
decay. Some do it even to this day. By such an exercise, we come
to know not what death is but rather how we relate to it. We can
never know death as it really is, till we actually die. So what's
the point of a talking about it! It's just another way of escaping
our painful feelings, our suffering. The peculiar thing is that
this sort of attitude, constantly turning away from what is painful,
blocking it, rationalising it, always escaping, causes the mind
to dwell on the good side of life, the pleasures, the excitements,
the 'bright future'. It produces an unreal optimism. "Things
always turn out all right. Life's great. I'm happy! Eat, drink
and be merry, for tomorrow we die. Not now! Anyway it won't happen
to me, not in the foreseeable future. So what's all this talk of
‘life is suffering’. I'm happy. Life's great!"
This sort of optimism is obviously false, leading to false beliefs
and false hopes. And beneath it all sit a lot of repressed fears
and anxieties. Such a person is not prepared for the 'slings and
arrows of outrageous fortune'. When the Buddha states that life
is unsatisfactory, he is asking us to see life as it really is and
not to shy away from its inbuilt suffering.
The opposite of this approach to life is when we submit passively
to suffering and misfortune. 'Life's hard and then you die!' A
helplessness. A loss of reason for living. "What's the point?
It's all work, work, work. Why bother, we're all going to die anyway".
At first sight, compared to the optimist, this might seem a little
more realistic. At least the pessimist is accepting totally the
one fact of life of which we can be certain. Indeed in the face
of overwhelming evidence that life does end, what is the point
of effort, of success? Death mocks all our ambitions and achievements.
The logical conclusion of such an understanding is despair and suicide,
or a brave stoicism where life just has to be suffered and you may
as well make the best of a bad job. For such people, living can
take on a certain desperation, and sometimes, quite paradoxically,
a compulsiveness to achieve, to win, to fly in the face of despair.
No doubt we have all faced certain events in our lives in these
two ways to some degree or another. But is there another way of
seeing life which neither leads us down the garden path of foolish
hopes nor drags us into tunnels of despair, despondency and gloom?
The Buddha would have us investigate life impartially, to see it
as it really is, accepting the situation totally. Within that clarity
of view it is easier for us to act. That is what he called the
Middle Path, and it is often the name given to his teachings. His
teachings were very clear on this point. Seeking happiness in the
pleasures of the senses suffering because such things don't last.
The person who concentrates his life on the next exciting thing
to do, is doing exactly this. Forever seeking enjoyment, distraction
and pleasure. Such persons are blind to the suffering that surrounds
them. On the other hand, people who try to deny all pleasure and
happiness and are overcome by the sufferings of life, have become
blinded to the possibility of the real peace and joy to be found
in living. What is worse is that both are blinded to the higher
reality that transcends both the pleasure and the tribulations of
life.
The Buddha asked us to take a realistic approach, not to pin our
hopes on the transient pleasures of life, nor to be overcome by
suffering and death, but to accept this dual situation totally,
work within it and try to discover what lies beyond it. This realistic
approach can be experienced at first hand in our meditation. What
is it we are doing but facing and accepting all the negativity that
arises, observing all the pleasurable and joyful feelings and thoughts,
and seeing all of this for what it really is, just passing phenomena,
momentary mental objects. Realising the passing nature of things
undercuts false hopes. Seeing the arising of things, the birth of
every moment, undercuts despair.
Let us take the threat of nuclear war. Not so long ago, many people
felt the threat of a nuclear holocaust as an ever-present reality.
They were fearful and anxious, angry and frustrated, depressed and
despairing. Others didn't seem to see the danger at all. They felt
secure under the nuclear umbrella, the deterrent. Anyway, they
say, a nuclear war is unthinkable. What's the point of fighting
it? No one would win. Humans wouldn't be so mad. Here we have
two opposite reactions to a given situation, the pessimistic and
the optimistic. Contemplating the possibility of a nuclear holocaust,
even if it were to happen by mistake, might awaken these never-will-happen
believers to the potential harm and motivate them to support disarmament.
Accepting the possibility of nuclear holocaust with all that that
means, especially to ourselves personally (for a lot of our fear
of nuclear war is a fear of our own death), both fear and anxiety
may be lessened. Once they are, we are much more capable of positive
action. Anxiety and fear drain our energy, bring about panic and
confusion. With a clearer mind, a more firm direction can be found.
But we can only do what we can do. For some it may mean joining
a march, for others influencing heads of state. We have to accept
our limitations. If we don't, we will suffer from anger, frustration,
depression and despair. This polarity of pessimism and false optimism
needs to be steadied towards a calm grasp of reality - seeing the
situation just as it is. We need to be very much aware of how our
emotions colour a situation.
Here lies the importance of meditation practice, Insight Vipassana
Meditation. This was the Buddha's great discovery in his Enlightenment.
He discovered that by just developing awareness, we are able to
heal all our negativities and slowly purify the heart. When we
sit, this is an opportunity to observe, really experience our moods
and emotions, our states of mind. But investigate here does not
mean to analyse, to ask questions, to wonder about the causes. It
means simply to experience, to feel the emotions and moods as they
really are. Equally important is to observe also our feelings about
them, our reactions to them. When I feel depressed, how do I feel
about it? Do I get angry? Do I get fearful and anxious? Do I get
depressed about being depressed? The first step in the meditation
is to begin to lose our fears and aversion towards states of mind.
This is the first step in purifying the mind. Having established
some concentration on the breath, we observe any state of mind that
arises, any mood or emotion that comes to our attention. Observe
them as bodily feelings. There may be feelings of heaviness from
depression, heat from anger, wobbliness from fear and tightness
from anxiety. These feelings manifest in different parts of the
body, sometimes in the chest, or stomach or abdomen for instance.
We just watch it all calmly, noticing, observing. We see that everything
is changing, everything is arising and passing away. What is it
we are achieving here? By this simple observation, we are losing
our fears of and aversion to negative states of mind as they arise.
By not repressing these negative states of mind, they display themselves
and to our amazement pass away. We are healing our hearts. We are
purifying our minds.
We must also be equally aware of pleasant feelings, observing them
just as keenly, but this time observing how mind grasps for them,
longs to indulge in them. Of course, they pass away too. Observing
the passing of pleasant states of mind stops us being falsely optimistic.
Observing the passing away of painful states of mind stops us being
pessimistic. Seeing both as passing phenomena leads to a realistic
view of life. When the mind is realistic - knowing things as they
really are - it is equanimous, peaceful. To win a million or to
lose a million does not ruffle this inner calm. This is the joy
of the Middle Path. This is what the Buddha wanted us to do - to
know ourselves as we really are. Meditation helps us to realise
this. But it shouldn't stop there. We should keep this frame of
mind, this understanding throughout the day. Everyday.
May the Teachings of the Buddha shed light into your
life!
May you quickly attain the Supreme Goal!
1. THE FIRST NOBLE TRUTH OF SUFFERING
Notes : ORDINARY SUFFERING dukkhadukkha
DUKKHA : pain, sorrow, misery, discontent, suffering, unsatisifactoriness
THE BUDDHA:
experienced suffering as a young man
The Three Heavenly Messengers:
the sick, the dying, the dead
The Great Renunciation
The First Noble Truth of Suffering:
ordinary suffering
suffering of change
suffering of conditioned states
Our Usual Reactions to Suffering:
Aversion : escapism : rationalization : false optimism
Submission (passive) : pessimism (despair)
Acceptance and pro-reaction realism (equanimity)
Daily Life:
Coping with physical pain
Coping with mental pain
Coping with this in others
Reaction to fortune and misfortune
Meditation:
Observing pleasant and unpleasant feelings, both physical and mental
(emotions)
Observing reactions to pain and pleasure
Observing them all as passing and unstable.
Using these notes can you write a small essay or give a small talk
(into a cassette perhaps?), using examples from your own life.
Finding a way of thinking about Dhamma makes for a deeper, more
personal understanding.
Back to Essays |